Skip to content
99 99Attorneys
NA

Nanette Augustin McCarthy

Chicago, Illinois · United States

★ 3.0 (15reviews)

Is this your profile? Claim it free to add your bio, photo, practice areas, and direct contact preferences. Claim listing

About

Nanette Augustin McCarthy is a family law attorney in Chicago, IL with 30 years of experience. Nanette focuses on child custody, divorce, and domestic violence cases.

Practice areas

Fees & rates

Hourly rate
$ 175-450 per hour
Payment methods
CashCheckCredit Card

Fees shown for reference. Confirm pricing directly with the attorney before retaining.

Languages

English

Office location

161 North Clark Street, Chicago, Illinois 60601

Client reviews · ★ 3.0 (15)

Write a review

Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Reviews reflect individual experiences and are not endorsements.

  • ★★★★Fraudulent billing and overcharging

    anonymous · family law ·

    I hired this law firm and I paid $ 5000 upfront, initially I talked to one lawyer, but, after payment I was assigned to a different one with way less experience! My husband and I came to An agreement and settled the case in about a month and half time, so basically not a lot was done in my case at al l as there were no disputes! My case ended October 3rd ! I received multiple invoices with unbelievable amounts and now even after ending the case they keep billing me and asking me to pay another$ 2000 on top of the $5000! I he worst part is they sent me a bill for temporary maintenance charges for NOV 11th way more than one month after ending my case! Go figure.. Rip off artists and money hungry! Someone needs to investigate this law firm and their overcharges and reimburse people who are cheated by them!

  • ★★★★Lawyers withdrew and left us hanging

    Greg · family law ·

    After 6 months, 2 court dates and $5000 in legal fees, Robert and his senior associate Renata Musial were unable to establish any visitation, custody, parenting time or child support agreements and withdrew themselves from our custody case. --- We arranged for a consultation and on-boarding with Ro bert in November 2022 following a Petition for Parentage for my son in the Cook County Circuit Court. Robert initially assured us that with a $2500 retainer, he could use his expertise to get us visitation somewhere between 2 weeks to a month through the use of emergency visitation rights. After on-boarding, we later found out the following week that Robert was not going to actually be handling the case but instead, trusted us to his paralegals and senior associate Renata. They immediately scrapped the possibility of filing for emergency visitation and began working on financial reviews. It turns out that during this time, Renata had "assumed that opposing counsel would agree to paternity" and by New Years Eve, after realizing this was not the case, a paternity would need to be ordered (18 DAYS BEFORE COURT) that she claimed would be covered by the court fee waiver. After many visits at Daley Center, city clerks had to explain to her over the phone that the court fee waiver would not cover test. We had to go back to the DNA center once again the following week and finally pay out of pocket as it turned out that the legal team did not file the case as the fee-waiver approved judicial type. By the first court hearing January 20th, judge dismissed session as paternity had still not been established, resulting in wasted court appearance and zero progress two months after onboarding with Robert. By this time, retainer had been completely used on financial reviews that were not yet necessary due to unconfirmed paternity tests and Robert was requesting an additional $1600 in fees for work they had done. We should have jumped ship at this point but after many complaints, Robert reduced bill to $700 and apologized for mishaps. Our next court appearance was for March 27th and we figured that the positive paternity results would make smooth sailing. Instead, Renata and newest paralegals had requested that we re-visit the previously compiled/completed financial affidavits from months before, citing that too much time had gone by. This incurred an additional several hundred dollars and additional discovery requests from the opposing counsel, all of which could have been completed at once now rather than months in advance at the cost of missing paternity deadlines. A week before next hearing, Renata provided what she believed to be a good offer: 1.5 hours of supervised parenting time per week at a museum 50 miles away from both the mother and I, with the condition of 10-panel ($500) drug test despite no criminal or drug abuse history or evidence of such. We had to point out to Renata that not only is this offer absolutely insane, but Illinois drug test court order form itself requires "evidence of potential drug abuse pursuant to IL Rule 215 (a)" which she previously dismissed at not applicable. At next court appearance on March 27th, because I was sick with stomach ailments, my parents sat in on the zoom hearing. It lasted all but 5 minutes and per their witness, opposing counsel made a series of unsubstantiated allegations concerning potential drug abuse until the judge asked for evidence which they could not provide. Renata remained quiet entire time and provided absolutely no defense to accusations nor did she bring up potential visitation or parenting time despite fact that paternity had finally been established. Zero progress again and we received her withdrawal 2 days later. We appreciate Robert's corporate professionalism but his team's mismanagement and inexperience has cost us thousands of dollars, zero results and valuable parenting time.

  • ★★★★Horrible financially draining experience with this law firm

    Agnes · family law ·

    I don’t normally post long reviews, but my experience with Buchanan Law Group was so costly and stressful that I feel obligated to warn others. I hired this firm for my divorce case, which should have been straightforward since my husband and I agreed on everything. Yet my case dragged on for a full year, and I spent nearly $20,000 with nothing completed and no meaningful progress to show for it. I ultimately had to hire a new attorney just to finally close out my file. The biggest issue was that the Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) and Allocation Judgment were never completed correctly, despite being billed for more than 15 hours of “drafting,” “reviewing,” “revising,” and “case reviews.” Important components I requested such as the child schedule, true-up language, and a provisional clause were never added, even after months of corrections and repeated emails from me. I often received “revised” documents that looked nearly identical to previous versions. Communication was poor throughout the entire case. I was never informed that a scheduled court date had been stricken. Whenever I asked questions by email, the responses were vague, incomplete, or evasive, forcing me to send multiple follow-ups just to get basic clarity. This made an already difficult time even more confusing and stressful. The billing practices were some of the worst I’ve encountered. They bill bi-weekly, and the moment your retainer dips or you go a single week without replenishing it, you receive an email threatening that they will file a motion to withdraw from your case. Meanwhile, they burn through your retainer performing constant “case reviews” and “review settlement emails” that resulted in zero progress. It often felt like they were billing for the sake of billing not to move the case forward. I was also charged attorney rates for blatantly clerical tasks like: – Adding a case number – Saving documents – Gathering and emailing files – Basic filing tasks These were billed at $325/hour, which is shocking considering the lack of actual legal progress. Perhaps the most serious issue was the mishandling of the SDU and child support filing. The paperwork was submitted incorrectly, which caused delays in my child support payments. I had to notify the firm that payments were not being processed due to their errors and then I was billed for their responses about the issue that they caused. After a year of constant “case reviews,” vague explanations, incorrect filings, and thousands of dollars wasted, I still did not have a completed MSA or Allocation. I ultimately had to hire a new attorney to finish what this firm never did. My experience with Buchanan Law Group and Rebecca LaRocque was extremely disappointing and financially draining. If you are considering this firm, please proceed with caution and monitor every invoice, every draft, and every communication. I genuinely wish someone had warned me before I spent so much time, money, and emotional energy with so little to show for it.

  • ★★★★Scam

    David ·

    They have automated system no live person they want your money that’s all run don’t go get

  • ★★★★Money Hungry

    anonymous · litigation ·

    Withdrew from my case after spending more than what I originally was told I would have to. Zero communication throughout case. Spent many nights worrying about the status of my case, Irina, Robert, and Rebecca purposefully kept communication to a minimum to run up the bill. Highly recommend looking a t any firm other than this one.

Showing 5 of 15

Other family law lawyers in Chicago